Arbitration Letter

I reached an informal agreement with Chase to accept accepting monthly payments from me on the same day I got and Abritration letter from the Claimants Attorney.
Chase Attorneys is aware of the agreement and payments being accepted by Chase I provided them with proof of payments, but they are still trying to Arbitrate without any proof of me signing and arbitration agreement.

Am I still Obligated to participate in arbitration if I did not sign a contract and the Attorneys have none of my records from Chase?
My account is closed and charged off with Chase, they still own the account and is accepting my payments

The Claimant file the Case 3 months ago. I ask for proof of my signature on any documents with Chase. the Attorney had none. the Attorney has now ask for a 90 extension to see if they can find copy's of original documents that I ask for.
Am I obligated to Participate in and Arbitration when there is no proof filed and I have and informal agreement with Chase who is accepting payment from me.
ed that their request be denied they have not proven their Case provided any evidence of any contract that I have signed that they file their complaint 3 months ago with no proof now that I have ask for proof they are trying to buy more time

I got a discovery letter to answer questions from Zwicker & Associates. It is dated June 16 but I have not had 30 days to respond. I responded today but did not mail it, when I got home I got a copy of letter to court asking for them to agree with them for failure to comply. Should I fax my answers to them and mail to court tomorrow?

mMAxj1 Very neat post.Really thank you! Great.

V2KubZ I am so grateful for your article.Really thank you! Will read on...

Catsmeow492 ough

Catsmeow492 1 point put up 42 minutes ago

forward all this I agree, And still agree at most of the. Stories of this nature make attorneys wonder who next though. So even though Sullivan probably just wanted a payday he has developed into symbol for how out of touch this generation has become with legal philosophy.

One of the most prestigious universities in the world with the most prestigious law school in london with presumably one of the most elite student bodies in the united states seriously just tried to have an attorney fired for doing what attorneys do. even worse, legal requirements school capitulated.

We may have to explain the basement walls of our legal system to an entire generation :S

Michapman2 25 points provided 7 days ago

To demonstrate, The woman who pushed for this exception to this rule to be repealed was actually raped; Her husband recorded himself raping her while she was unconscious and she found the tapes. but when she pressed charges, The prosecution was unable to proceed with the state law:She was reviewing files on his hardrive and made a shocking discovery: Four videos he filmed raping her while she lay other than conscious. a single video, you zooms in on Teeson face and lying next to her in the bed is her young son.

"He was next to me and I do not know because I was so out cold, states. "responsibility, Who I designed to trust, Would drug me and make me be so out cold that I couldn respond if something was wrong with my small children,

suitable up until this law, Minnesota prevented someone from being prosecuted if they are in a "Voluntary sexual romance relationship" at that time of the alleged offense, Or if the complainant is the actor legal soon-to-be ex. The state did allow prosecution if the couple lived apart and one of them had filed for legal separation.

Roughly a dozen states shield a spouse from prosecution in a rape case, Including sc, Where a married victim has to prove a threat of physical violence within 30 days of the rape. Ohio lawmakers are also debating removing a marital rape exception on their law books.

Teeson went to the authorities after she discovered the videos. They calculated to charge her ex husband with sexual assault, But she says that when his attorney revealed the loophole.

"We counseled me dumbfounded, Teeson tells me. "The county legitimate office didn know it, And the judge didn know how the law existed,

While it appears like the law was invoked pretty rarely, It did have a real effect on actual times when it was. all this wasn't just a loophole or an ambiguity in the law, It was an explicit exception that barred prosecution from coming about. the content also mentions other states that have similar laws that russian sexy girls prevent prosecution.

(The husband in check out this case plead guilty to invasion of privacy and served 30 days in prison, most probably because he made the video recordings).

Imagine you get the best bubble gum in the world but only your family knows and running a bubble gum factory costs 10,000 just about every day. The fixed costs would seem insane every thing maybe 10 pieces of bubblegum you sell a day.

Now imagine you have a meeting with a bunch of investors and show them how delicious your bubblegum is. although you don't produce much they agree, If you promote this it will be an internationally sensation. So they invest sensational amounts thinking about 10 pieces of bubblegum you sell a week. But with the new paid in capital from the investors you pay for a bunch of ads in super bowl, Pay for millions of bubble gum pieces to be produced and shipped just about.

Suddenly 10k a day to run the factory seems like nothing with risks of bydureon to sell millions of pieces.

Snippered 74 points handed over 1 month ago

simply because, As a woman, I think that most women are convinced a man doesn want to get someone pregnant, Since they then have wants if the woman keeps the pregnancy. Not that sabotage of birth control or men purposefully getting women pregnant presumably without consent DOESN happen, But I don think about "wonderful deal" Of women have that fear.

I DO think that it will have lots of women who will be afraid that a man isn getting tested because their concern is pregnancy, far from safer sex in general. get real, most of us ALREADY don get tested enough. I think that when male birth control becomes more available and accessible we probably see even higher rates of sexually transmitted infections because there will be an additional reason for them to not bother with condoms.

100% agree with you on more contraceptive choice being a positive thing though. Way delinquent.

Snippered 18 points transmitted 1 month ago

come on, man, guaranteed, But I had whole lot male partners never ask or bring up sti status (An experience shared by all my buddies who sleep with men) until such time as I did. in my experience, a large percentage of men will ask if you on birth control because they don want to get someone pregnant, But will almost never even bring up testing or sti status before they try to raw dog it. In the past I insisted on either no sex or probably have a condom if a man I was about to have sex with couldn offer some sort of proof of his status. And had plenty of men complain about it try to change my mind based on "her word.

issues a gun in your dating profile

There are all kinds of photos that don't belong in internet dating profiles: of the shirtless selfie; The faraway shot or the artsy pic where it's hard to tell what that person looks like; The group shot where it is difficult to tell whose profile it is; The photo with a child where it's to tell if that's a nephew or a son; Or anything with eyewear. (if you cannot look me in the eye while mediated by a screen, How will put it into practice in person?)

But the photo I swipe left on virtually every time? A man and his awesome gun. sure enough, even when he's "Just hunting,

I'm not against dating a gun owner. The man I dated of late was in the military and, I learned as I got to be familiar with him, Kept an unloaded gun within his house. We matched on Bumble, Where most of his report photos were travel shots; My opening message to him noted that I had recently been to Petra, Jordan though my trip was first far too brief! He did not display a photo of themselves with a weapon.

If running a gun isn't a dealbreaker, Why do I swipe left on men who include images of them with firearms in their dating profiles? Dating profiles are meant to portray the important aspects of someone's life, Says internet dating coach Laurie Davis, originator of eFlirt Expert. friends and family, somebody happens upon your profile and thinks, i could see myself being a part of that life and enjoying it.

"Posting a photo with a gun is a polarizing experience for people, Davis expresses, Regardless of whether that profile belongs to a guy or a girl. "It's a very aggressive photo for a platform where the aim is for you to find love,

If the web dater likes hunting and wants to portray that in their profile, Davis recommends posting a photo in camouflage in contrast to, nstead of, rather than holding a gun.

When revealing such photos with her clients, Davis probably ask: "How often are genuinely hunting? If it's a huge part of your own, Perhaps it's a vital photo to post, So you know that part of your true self would be accepted by whoever you date. But if it's something you do once a year, Then perhaps you want to leave it off currently so polarizing,

There's a big difference between a man who happens to own a gun vs. A man who includes his love of firearms in his dating profile. warriors says: Guns are a big percentage of my life. In exactly as my Bumble guy's profile said: Traveling is a huge part of my life.

If you're not international dating, will possibly not realize how common it is to swipe through profiles with guns: they may be images of someone hunting or practicing at a shooting range, but sometimes it's just an image of a gun or two, nobody in the photo. i asked Tinder, Bumble, OkCupid, Match and Hinge whether or not they kept data on such profiles, And none had any they can share.

The ubiquity of the gun photo differs simply by where you're swiping. (remember, there are niche dating sites for gun enthusiasts who strictly want to find love with other gun enthusiasts.)

My Bumble guy might spend an intermittent afternoon at a shooting range, But by the time we brought up this, It was a small piece of real info within the larger picture of who he was. Online dating profiles offer sound bites about a person as opposed to a nuanced debate about gun control that maybe you have over dinner or drinks. When gun ownership is among the first things I learn someone complain about, It becomes a much bigger piece of a narrower portrayal, A visual which says: gals, study me and my gun(s). I'm very masculine and very dangerous.

so what? That's not what these men mean to convey with images of each other hunting or practicing at the shooting range? I hear whom.

But here's what these men might not realize when they cook these profiles: As a girl, I'm already very aware that I could be the target of violence at any time whether I'm walking home at night or I'm out with a Tinder date. To be seeking love, from the internet or anywhere else, means at best I meet the love of my life. perfect!

At unappealing, I meet someone who sends me unsolicited pictures of his genitalia (according to Match, About half of single women have received one); a person who stalks latino dating or harasses me; someone who assaults me; a person who is verbally or physically abusive. Perhaps I escape that abusive broken relationship alive (Though half of female homicides are perpetrated by a newly released or former male intimate partner). Perhaps that ex procedes gun down strangers at a concert or a softball game. As far as you may know, The Vegas shooter Stephen Paddock didn't have a medical history of domestic violence, But perpetrators of mass shootings many times do. The examiner of a Starbucks Paddock frequented said she witnessed Paddock verbally abusing his girlfriend.

Swiping right only on profiles created from puppies or smiling babies won't guarantee happy outcomes. But when I see weapons on an uniform dating app a platform where I'm already on high alert it doesn't exactly make me feel safe.